Primary innovation is doing something that has never been done before.
Most primary innovation is ridiculous and fails without anybody noticing.
Very, very rarely, primary innovation changes the world and the company that creates the innovation becomes a Unicorn.
Secondary innovation wins by giving a twist to that primary innovation. The two simple twists are:
- Apply the primary innovation to a different country aka “concept arbitrage”. A lot of European and Asian Fintech falls into this category. This is more viable in Fintech because “bits don’t stop at borders, but money has to show its passport” (meaning that regulation is a barrier to entry).
- Apply the primary innovation to a different domain aka the xx of yy (e.g. the “Uber or AiBnB of..). A lot of “subprime VC” goes to fund this type of secondary innovation.
Secondary innovation is a perfectly sensible way to make money. It is just not as interesting as primary innovation. It is hard to imagine creating a Unicorn with secondary innovation (but very easy to get headline valuations over $1 billion for secondary innovation).
The number of primary innovations is really limited. Maybe there are 10 in Fintech. Historically, almost all primary innovation has come from Silicon Valley.
Occasionally what appears to be secondary innovation – the small twist – is actually the game-changing innovation. For example, Angel List Syndicates could look like a small twist to the equity crowdfunding concept. I think Angel List Syndicates is actually the innovation that changes the whole asset management business.
I think Klarna is one of those few primary innovations. The fact that this primary innovation comes from Europe is significant.
The Klarna story has some “straws in the wind” that indicate something big such as:
- Klarna has raised $282m, which is a lot for a European startup.
- The investors are top tier. Sequoia Capital has the best track record of spotting primary innovation early and Michael Moritz (who led Sequoia Capital in it’s current incarnation) chose Klarna as the only European Board to join. General Atlantic (who came in after Sequoia Capital) only buy when the financial metrics are strong. So while I don’t have access to Klarna’s financials, I assume they are strong.
- Klarna are already consolidating the European market through acquisitions and then purposefully moving into the US market. This is not European acquisition bait for a global winner from America. This a global winner from Europe that will be big in America (and then probably Asia).
So much for the straws, what about the wind?
In my book Mindshare to Marketshare (shameless promotion here), I describe turning “secret sauce” into “unfair advantage”.
Secret sauce is the primary innovation. It has to be solving a big problem/filling a real need (aka “value proposition”). In Klarna’s case, that is:
Less time/hassle buying on a mobile phone (consumer)
Less mobile shopping cart abandonment (merchant).
What Klarna offers is actually very old fashioned – buy now, we will collect money after you have the goods. It is what you do in the physical world (pay the barista only after you have your coffee). Doing that digitally means managing fraud and deadbeats (which is really what the Credit Card industry does). Klarna’s secret sauce was simply to track the user via their confirmed national identity. This is easy in a small homogenous country like Sweden. It turns out it also works in Germany (thus the Sofort experience) and I know it works in Switzerland where I live.
America is not fundamentally different, even though “homogenous” is not a normal descriptor. Social Security works as ID. ID theft is a big issue; it will be interesting to see how Klarna navigates that issue.
It is easy to conclude that the Rest (every other than Europe, America, Japan) is different. Klarna has its hands full in Europe and America for now, but they will soon have to tackle Asia. This where the Unique Identification Authority of India is significant.
Could this be the first European primary innovation that launches concept arbitrage in America? Affirm looks like a candidate. I don’t think concept arbitrage will work in this market because Klarna already has top tier American investors.
So, does this make Stockholm the Fintech Capital of the World? No, but Nordic Fintech is also well represented in Saxo Bank.
This will be my last post for this week. Happy Holidays.
[…] “Adyen is a European Fintech Unicorn with American money.” That story is becoming so common now as to be almost boring – see Saxo Bank and Klarna. […]
[…] we can see Klarna and Adyen clearly doing very well. I see two factors in their […]
[…] Klarna […]
[…] we can see Klarna and Adyen clearly doing very well. I see two factors in their […]
[…] will illustrate this formula using Klarna as an […]
[…] American VC money is coming into European Fintech. First Sequoia with Klarna, then General Atlantic with Adyen and Saxo, now Andreessen Horowitz with […]
[…] American VC money is coming into European Fintech. First Sequoia with Klarna, then General Atlantic with Adyen and Saxo, now Andreessen Horowitz with […]
[…] Growth Equity funds and compete to invest wherever on the globe the venture is based (for example, Sequoia investing in Klarna and Andreessen Horowitz investing in […]
[…] are seeing examples of European companies seizing the global market lead in payments (e.g Adyen and Klarna). The old narrative was that European ventures were copycats which were acquired by US ventures […]
[…] are seeing examples of European companies seizing the global market lead in payments (e.g Adyen and Klarna). The old narrative was that European ventures were copycats which were acquired by US ventures […]
[…] are seeing examples of European companies seizing the global market lead in payments (e.g Adyen and Klarna). The old narrative was that European ventures were copycats which were acquired by US ventures […]
[…] have already seen mega raises in this space from Adyen, Klarna and BlueSnap. For a long time, payments has been the boulevard of broken dreams. This is changing […]
[…] Poland is #23 in global GDP rankings (between Sweden and Argentina). A market only has to be big enough to run a statistically significant market experiment. That is the Klarna story. […]
[…] Poland is #23 in global GDP rankings (between Sweden and Argentina). A market only has to be big enough to run a statistically significant market experiment. That is the Klarna story. […]
[…] A few ventures outside America have proved that location of origin matters less (Skype, Adyen, Klarna, Saxo all come to mind within Europe). Investors have taken note and are going […]
[…] and I do not think it is a coincidence that three great Fintech ventures from this region include Klarna, Saxo Bank and […]
[…] and I do not think it is a coincidence that three great Fintech ventures from this region include Klarna, Saxo Bank and […]
[…] inside the EU, take the Fintech city tour to Stockholm. Look at huge Fintech success stories like Klarna in Stockholm or Saxo Bank in Copenhagen. Go to Money 2020 in Copenhagen. Smart Silicon Valley money sees this […]
[…] based software company that offers analytics for fraud prevention. Klarna is a client (and the Klarna model is the most fundamental threat to the credit card networks). Fraud prevention is key to […]
[…] Poland is #23 in global GDP rankings (between Sweden and Argentina). A market only has to be big enough to run a statistically significant market experiment. That is the Klarna story. […]