Site icon Daily Fintech

The Growing Network of Fintech Accelerators Globally

It’s a good time to be raising money in Fintech. All the major VC Funds are making Fintech bets, there is good activity on Angel List, there are Fintech specific funds and there are Fintech specific networking groups.

Many Accelerators are domain agnostic. I have already reviewed the Fintech output from Y Combinator, which is generally recognized as the Accelerator leader (but only an option for founders who are willing to live in Silicon Valley).

Today’s post focusses on the 10 Fintech specific Accelerators that I found. I have updated it with two that I missed (thanks, please tell me if I have missed any others):

Six themes arise:

1. The location is a magnet for ventures in the region or globally. For example, the Accenture Accelerator in Hong Kong has startups from all across the Asia region but also has one from Canada (presumably because they target Asian customers). Barclays Accelerator is only in London but draws startups globally and actively seeks them from America.

2. Accelerators powered by a single bank sponsor make it clear that the bank has no proprietary rights and that startups are encouraged to reach out to all banks that they want to work with as customers and/or partners.

3. Like a College, the peer pressure matters as much if not more than the quality of the professors (or “mentors” in this case). It is the pressure cooker of putting up your metrics every day in front of equally smart and driven founders that drives results – plus the fixed deadline (usually around 12 weeks) by which you have to be ready (classic Agile time boxing).

4. They stress that this is not just for early/seed stage but also works for growth stage after Series A. I wonder about this in practice as a growth stage venture should already have its metrics and growth hacking nailed.

5. Ventures can be in more than one Accelerator. For example, I spotted Advanced Merchant Payments in both Level 39 and Accenture Hong Kong.

6. Some differentiation is happening. For example, I spotted more Capital Markets plays in Level 39, which makes sense given their location. Barclays tends towards Consumer ventures, which makes sense given the Techstars focus. I suspect that this trend will accentuate as a Capital Markets venture will tend to seek out Level 39 and a Consumer venture will tend to seek out Barclays/Techstars, for example.

The big question is whether all this Accelerator activity accentuates the Series A Crunch problem (too big an early stage supply through a narrow gate of a few Funds). I see this as less of a problem than some for three reasons:

Update of new Accelerators (at least new to me) since original post:

AWI Ventures, Sydney, Australia

Polytech Ventures, Lausanne, Switzerland




Skip to toolbar